Tag Archives: William P Young

I Watched #Hellbound Before I Changed It to Buffy #btvs

Last night I was pretty bored and I needed to watching something while I did some fall cleaning. Lo, and behold, I decided to watch the documentary, Hellbound?, written and directed by Canadian Christian writer Kevin Miller. From all that I had heard and read, it was supposed to be a worthwhile film, and maybe someday I will go back and finish. But just not this year. The movie was fine, I could see the direction it was going: BIG NINE-ELEVEN TWO THOUSAND AND ONE DRAMA! The Phelps and their hate speech where 99.99999999% of the people living in the world are going to burn in hell for all eternity! Mark Driscoll implying anyone who disagreed with him was not manly enough and kind of queer. So NOT authoritarian! Liar and heretic Ray Comfort even had an appearance.

Nope none of these persons were problematic enough to trigger me into watching something else. Then, Miller first started making claims like all religions are about narrative, and story is ooooh so important to what it means to be human. It’s a familiar argument, one that Brian McLaren was writing about in the ’90’s. You see, there are a variety of Christianities. There’s the fundamentalists who claim to take the Bible “literally” but never seriously. And there are also Christians who read Scripture as literature and somewhat more seriously. While the latter sounds better, at least the BIG OLE SCARY fundies are honest and forthright about the implications of their beliefs.

Then, Hellbound started interviewing the likes of Wm Paul Young and Frank Schaeffer. Throughout his few minutes, Schaeffer repeatedly referred to Evangelicals as Pharisees. This claim went unchallenged, and given the lack of racial diversity in the film (it’s a Christian documentary, so not surprising given the “nature” of the business). Frantz Fanon argues in his Black Skin, White Masks that once you find an anti-Semite, there’s not an anti-Black antagonist far behind. Part of my path down the narrow road of anti-racism was taking a Jewish-Studies course that coincided with a Black Church studies class on Exodus. It was there that I first learned of how problematic loosely calling others Pharisees was. Jesus and Paul were Pharisees,

Cover of "Black Skin, White Masks"

Cover of Black Skin, White Masks

Pharisees were some of the very first Christians in Acts, but in liberal and conservative Christianity, people continue a willful ignorance of the history of antiSemitism and anti-Judaism. I’m sorry, but the Pharisees are not the villains you make them out to be. That’s why it’s no surprise when in liberal “Christian novels,” such as Wm. Paul Young’s The Shack, anti-Judaism goes unchecked.


English: Black Buffy the vampire slayer TV ser...

English: Black Buffy the vampire slayer TV series logo. High resolution, please remember to resize for use. {| cellspacing=”0″ style=”min-width:40em; color:#000; background:#ddd; border:1px solid #bbb; margin:.1em;” class=”layouttemplate” | style=”width:1.2em;height:1.2em;padding:.2em” | 20px |link=|center | style=”font-size:.85em; padding:.2em; vertical-align:middle” |This vector image was created with Inkscape. |} Buffy the vampire slayer.svg (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

But I think that there is something that goes much deeper. At the heart of the problem is the notion of story. I have discussed on here before the problem of seeing everything as a story here before, as it relates to postcolonial criticism.

So last night, when I changed the show I was watching on Netflix to Buffy the Vampire Slayer, I decided to watch the season 7 episode “Storyteller,” the story of Andrew who was shooting a documentary about Buffy, the slayer of vampires, and I found this relevant quote:

“Buffy: Stop! Stop telling stories. Life isn’t a story.
Andrew: Sorry. Sorry.
Buffy: Shut up. You always do this. You make everything into a story so no one’s responsible for anything because they’re just following a script.”- Storyteller, Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 7, Episode 16.

This is exactly the problem with emergent dudebros. They do not have to take responsibility for the histories of biblical interpretations or practices there of. They can just call it “STORY” since it sounds so much nicer. No way should they be held accountable for the real, historical experiences of the oppressed because when it comes to the Grand Narrative, only an arbitrarily limited account provided by men from the majority culture.

Perhaps then this is why the story of the Hellmouth remains truer than that of Hellbound? .

The Shack Revisited By C. Baxter Kruger

This book review is being submitted as part of an agreement in exchange for a review copy.

The Shack Revisited: There Is More Going On Here Than You Ever Dared to Dream by C Baxter Kruger, and foreword by Wm. Paul Young.


For the first two chapters, Kruger remained true to his thesis, that the book was a theological exploration of The Shack. However, for the rest of the book, up until the very last chapter, the focus on The Shack was marginal at best, with just quotes from the novel interspersed with quotes from Barth, Calvin, and Athanasius. Nothing really wrong with that, except that the book was supposed to be about The Shack and really read more like a book on the history of Western theology with random quotes from the novel added in. I really enjoyed reading Kruger’s take on Athanasius, Arius, and Irenaeus and the Church Fathers. I would rather read more about these folks than Pappa and Mack, honestly. That being said, I would recommend this book for laypersons interested in church history as well as academics and pastors who are fans of The Shack who want to find a way to talk about the Trinity/church history/theological studies with laity.

The Shack: Reflections For Every Day Of The Year by Wm. Paul Young

As per an agreement to receive a review copy of this book, I am writing a review of this work here.

The Shack:Reflections For Everyday Day Of The Year by Wm. Paul Young


In the past, I have reviewed The Shack from an anthropological perspective, with a liberationist interpretation of its characters. The Shack:Reflections is more of a devotional to guide fans of The Shack to reflect on what Wm. Paul Young is trying to teach us about God. The emphasis is on a God who is with us in our pain and suffering, who love us and is working for us. I see this devotional as an act in practical theology,a way of doing relational theology. Although, be warned, it is very light on citing Scripture.

I would recommend this book for any person who is a fan of The Shack. If you are not, just don’t bother.