Tag Archives: the problem of evil

The Fall to Empire

The following contains brief excerpts from a forthcoming article in Testamentum Imperium.

We have all heard the same story, about a garden, about a woman that leads the world into sin, and God curses humanity with sin, which leads to death (Genesis 2 & 3). These are the rules, as put forth by centuries of Christian tradition, for discussing the nature of evil, sin, and the devil as it is called. Perhaps another way to look at the origins of sin is look for the moment when God promises salvation available for all nations and the events that lead up to God taking that action. For many Christians, the covenant that God makes to Abraham is that promise for redemption.

I submit that the Genesis (1-11:8) accounts are microcosmic stories used to tell us of macrocosmic events (true myths). Rather than having sin be passed biologically (obviously through the mother, right?), I believe that human beings are brought into a sinful world through a network of complex relationships and discourses; that is to say that human wickedness is passed down interpersonally through dialogue and practices.

I believe a more adequate account of human brokenness, in light of multi-narratival nature of the canon which was formed under the auspices of Jewish diasporic existence, is to be found from Genesis 1 through 11:8 (right before the genealogy of Abram). After Adam and Eve are banished from God’s sanctuary, Eden, their sons are involved in a tragic murder incident, for which Cain is sent into exile. Humanity later becomes so unrighteous that God floods the known worlds, and then God enters into an eternal covenant with all of creation, promising never to destroy the world as God did in those days (Genesis 9:11 NIV).

This blessing of a cursed earth is a sign of God displaying humility, an attribute that reveals itself in the Bible regularly. Unfortunately, humankind refused to participate in God’s power of self-giving, and instead built up for itself a tower to reach the heavens; such a construction project was quite easy with everyone speaking the same language and all (Genesis 11:1, 6). YHWH, in God’s wisdom, saved human beings from centralized, authoritarian tyranny and hegemonic social structures by “confusing” all the languages of the world (11:9, NIV).

It is because of our fallenness, that human beings define power in terms of the will to coerce, the building up of military strength, and uninhibited economic and social desires. German contextual theologian Karl Barth understood rightly that sin was a “power,” a sovereign entity that ruled over humanity, and that death is the power of sin made visible (see Barth’s Epistle to the Romans, 6th edition, page 167). The very personification of our cultures of death is what postcolonial thinkers call “postcolonial empire,” whereby instead of countries settling other nations through war or “cultural influence,” imperial control happens through soft power (money) perhaps like oil revenue sharing agreements with countries in the Middle East that we just happened to liberate conquer such as Iraq.

What of the devil or demons? I have already argued elsewhere that satan (and I guess we can include it’s minions as well, an impersonal luring voice(s) or entity(ies) in the world (no power but lying) attempting to keep humans trapped in arrogance, sin, and death, apart from the One True Self-Humiliating God.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Is The Devil Real?

Arkhangelsk (Arkhangelsk oblast), coat of arms...

Image via Wikipedia

I know a number of friends who are Christians who have come to reject the existence of ha satan (Satan), the Devil, the evil, or the Enemy. For many Christians, starting with Genesis three, the serpent is the personifcation of the Devil. A few Hebrew Bible scholars have argued that it may not be necessary to jump to such conclusions, given that the talking serpent is a symbol of wisdom in Ancient Near Eastern religious thought. In the same vein, Ezekiel 28 is understood as a description of Satan’s fall from the heavenly realm. Again, historically, this leap is not necessary, for it may be just an allegory for the King of Tyre as an Adamic person being excommunicated from God’s garden.

I think, while I agree mostly with these interpretations, that theologically, I think there is a “being” Christians recognize as the Enemy. I am not a dualist, I don’t believe that the Devil can make anyone do anything or that it can control the weather or any other elements, that it is an impersonal cosmic voice that lies, trying to lure humanity into choosing sin. I say impersonal because Satan’s personality has been stripped from it, and that it does not have any freedom (in the sense of being in God’s presence). Dutch Pauline theologian Henrik Berkhof, in his Christ and the Powers, argues that satan as a “power” is personal. But I am not convinced of his argument.

What say you? Is the devil real? Is it important to believe in “Satan” as a fundamental Christian belief?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Firefly & Theology, Part 1: The Alliance and The Reavers

A-Theodicy and the Problem of Evil

A few months ago, I was introduced to an excellent t.v. series and film, Firefly and Serenity. For those that are unfamiliar, Firefly was the invention of Buffy the Vampire creator Joss Whedon. Imagine the last three episodes of the Star Wars saga, intermixed with the greatness of the film Tombstone (“Im ya Huckleberry”) and you get the science fiction legend that is Firefly. In fact, the western frontier setting, though taking place in outer space and on terraformed planets, Whedon admits in interviews that he was inspired by the history of the Civil War, and it shows.

I enjoyed Firefly very much, as a political thinker, as a lover of history, and as a theologian. So, today begins my theological interpretation of the series + the movie, and minus the comic books, which I have not read. The reader should be aware that Joss Whedon, in interviews, rejects any notion of a “sky bully” but there are many religious themes that play out, especially in Buffy (the movie and the series).

This is part ONE of SIX.

THE UNION OF ALLIED PLANETS, aka,THE ALLIANCE

The problem of existence of evil is a theme that looms large in the world of FIREFLY. Several questions come to mind: What is the face of evil? Where does evil come from? How can humanity respond to it? The last question will be addressed in the last five posts, for in the FIREFLY universe, Whedon’s response to the problem of evil comes in the form of the crew of Serenity, the space ship.

What does evil look like? In, my interpretation of FIREFLY, wickedness looks like human domination. It comes in the disguise of good intentions such as civilizing other cultures and bringing technological advances, but on the inside, the good deeds turn out to be the worst of all wickedness in the drive to control the minds and bodies of other human beings.

Our saga begins when the Earth is overpopulated (according to the film Serenity). Humanity must create terraformed planets that take decades to form. Out of these planets, there are the core planets, the center, or what becomes known as the Alliance, which becomes the “beacon of civilization.” The outer planets [the people groups on the margins ;-)] are seen as “not enlightened.” In the name of a safer universe, the Interplanetary Parliament decrees the War for Unification. The Independents lose, and the Alliance rules the galaxy, so to speak. The Operative (the nameless antagonist in the film Serenity) represents the ideology of the Alliance. Inara calls him dangerous, for he is a true believer, “intelligent, methodical,

    devout

.” The Operative, speaking in the royal we, announces, “We’re making a better world. All of them. Better worlds.”

THE OPERATIVE

What makes the Operative (and therefore the Alliance) represent Joss Whedon’s notion of evil is that the Operative is an assassin who works for the Parliament. At one point, he persuades a scientist to commit suicide, for it is “an honorable death” for the purpose of hiding the Alliance’s dirty secret (unknown to T.O. at the time). The Operative believes in the creation of “a world without sin” (a utopia consisting in hegemonic control behind the threat of lethal force) and he even goes as far as killing children in order to achieve this end. Yes, the Operative (and therefore the Alliance are wicked), but they are not incapable of change, as one discovers in the film [i.e., in Christian terms, the possibility of repentance].

JUBAL EARLY, BOUNTY HUNTER

While the crew of Serenity run into a number of criminals (they themselves are no better than fugitives on the run), the most compelling and interesting criminal mind, in my opinion is the bounty hunter Jubal Early. His character reminds me much more like Heath Ledger‘s Joker in the movie The Dark Knight.

JUBAL EARLY, BOUNTY HUNTER

In my subjective Christian opinion, Jubal Early, while not affiliated with the Alliance also represents the face of evil in the FIREFLY universe, for his vision of the world is in direct contradiction to Whedon’s gospel. For Joss Whedon, the human body takes center stage in his work; it is the body that performs gender, race, nationality, and ultimately, human freedom can only be obtained in bodily form. Thus, human liberty is not something left in the abstract (just watch a few episodes of Buffy and Dollhouse, it’s there). Jubal Early, on the other hand, has an utter disregard for the human body. He plays mind games, and would prefer intellectual manipulation than hand-to-hand combat. Take note that in the episode, “Objects in Space,” I do not believe that it was a coincidence that Early is wearing red (as opposed to the Independents’ preference for Brown or the Alliance color blue). In a comical but serious conversation with Simon Tam, Early tells Simon Tam the ship’s doctor, “I don’t think of myself as a lion. You might as well though. I have a mighty roar.” 1st Peter 5:8 gives the image of the evil One as a lion, no? That was the first passage that came to my mind.

Early’s disdain for humanity’s embodiment is revealed in his misogyny. In his interactions with Kaylee the mechanic, he threatens her with rape, as if it were nothing. Through his conversations with Inara the Companion, he makes the following comment, “Man is stronger by far than a woman. Yet only a woman can create a child. Does that seem right to you?” Jubal Early, time and again asks, “Does that seem right to you?” relying on the error of common sense, as if the others know what he is thinking. His egoism (in contrast to the individualism of other members of the crew) is extremely narcissistic. But in the end, River Tam (Simon’s teenage sister) exposes J.E. as a “liar, a a bad liar” whose own mother “saw a darkness” in him”- “Power. Control. Pain.” Early’s blind ambition would be his undoing.

THE REAVERS

With the faces of evil exposed in the FIREFLY universe, I must now turn to the second part of the question of evil: Where does evil come from? Quite simply, evil is a human construct, and the effects of that construction is social in nature.

THE REAVERS. AAAH!

It was the Alliance desire to create a inter-planetary system whereby all human beings would be conformed in the Alliance’s image. To do this, the Alliance sought a way to prevent human persons from fighting back. Their solution was to experiment with a gas that would end human aggression. The Pax gas (pax being Latin for peace, the false peace of empire, i.e., Pax Romana) was used in experiments on the terraformed planet Miranda, on the very outskirts of the Universe. Rather than weeding out aggression, however, it had two affects. First, a large portion of the population on Miranda died for not eating, losing the will to survive. However, the remnant became even far more aggressive to the point of losing their humanity: The Reavers, a cannibalistic nation that would ravage ships. Multiple times in the series and movie, the shipmates of Serenity would try to remind themselves that maybe in another life, the Reavers were human, but now they are monsters. The interesting part about the role of the Reavers is that about half of those living on other planets do not believe in the existence of Reavers (that they should be left to old wives tells) while those that have seen them first hand know how dangerous they are. The legend works to make them larger than life, and in the process, works towards furthering their marginalization and dehumanization.

The monstrosity, however, is not the Reavers’ collectivity, but in fact, the society that gave birth to them: the Alliance is the monster that made the efforts to marginalized these people. The Reavers are the blowback of imperial domination. The source of evil is group of human beings that work against human liberation.

The last five parts of this series will be the crew of Serenity, as Whedon’s anti-colonial religious response to evil.

Enhanced by Zemanta