Tag Archives: Christian movie reviews

5 Takeaways from #Selma @SelmaMovie

This past Friday, in spite of no showings of Ava Duvernay’s Selma (2015) being shown in Fort Worth theaters, a friend and I were able to see the film in Grand Prairie. We had to endure being in line where there was only one cashier at the box office, but once we were in the theater, there weren’t even ten other viewers who showed up. Able to choose where I sat, I picked the usual: middle aisle, middle seats. Movie theaters are the only place where I choose “the Middle Way.” After we the audience got through twenty minutes of previews, the actual movie started. Throughout the film, my mind was racing with thoughts, being reminded of the current issues of today and how injustice functions and what role religion plays in society. I told a number of friends I had gone to see the movie, and a few of them requested that I write out my thoughts. So here, without further ado, are five takeaways from my viewing of SELMA. Oh and yes, general Spoiler Alert

1. Selma is an example of exactly what a “Christian” or faith film should look like. In the recent decade, Evangelical Christian culture has struggled to get a presence in Hollywood, offering movies from Fireproof to Courageous to even my favorite of that group One Night With The King.  Selma is a film that portrayed both the piety of clergy and lay people not as some awkward conversionism, but something to be embodied and portrayed everyday. When King is in jail, his friends are citing the words of Jesus to calm him down.  When King needs to hear the voice of God, he calls Mahalia Jackson to soothe his fear of death. More importantly, Christianity is depicted as more diverse than the run-of-the-mill nondenominational Bible church evangelicalism of the aforementioned films. When King decides to march across the bridge to Montgomery, he is greeted by an Eastern Orthodox priest. An almost perfect picture of ecumenism at work.

2. If it wasn’t for the women, would there be a Civil Rights Movement? Not enough work has been done on the importance of women, especially Black women’s roles during the Civil Rights Movement. We are given the opportunity to empathize with the struggle of Anna Cooper who is denied her basic right to vote. We are given a small glimpse of Diane Nash’s influence in Reverend Dr. King’s inner circle. We see just how essential Coretta Scott King was to MLK’s ministry. Her encounter with Malcolm X was symbolic of the real philosophical differences between Martin’s side and Malcolm’s side.

3. Selma’s representation of debates about how to go about dismantling White Supremacy only scratched the surface. As I mentioned above, Malcolm according to the film Selma, chose to use himself as a foil to Martin, so that MLK could be seen as the “more respectable” of the two.  Yet while these disagreements continue to be debated, I don’t think that Malcolm is portrayed as anti-thetical to the cause of Black civil rights. Malcolm’s and Martin’s goal are the same (the eradication of legal Jim Crow racial segregation) and on that front, they have common ground. The other debate, between SNCC (the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee) and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (the SCLC), the typology of the young disgruntled radicals facing up against their more experienced, more powerful elders, rings true in the Internet Age. For what its worth (and I admit, I may be a part of the problem), it seems that many youthful, energetic communities that rely on digital media are playing the trope of SNCC while there is no SCLC really around.  What are the ways that contemporary movements for social justice can work against ageism? As I heard someone say before, I don’t wanna be in a revolution that my mother cannot partake.

4. The Social Justice Film Genre Is In Right Now. 12 Years A Slave. Fruitvale Station. The Help. Lee Daniels The Butler.  Beasts Of The Southern Wild. You hear about them every year now. Each year, there are those two are three independent films which center around social issues. They are for the most part, well acted. There are cameos by big name celebrities who have invested money in the film (think Oprah Winfrey in Selma, Brad Pitt in 12 Years, for example). These celebrities may even get too much camera time in this author’s opinion. Part of the experience also involves a lot of emotional investment on the part of the audience. There is a general expectation that there will either be tears or anger. It’s no laughing matter to see enslaved Black persons being beaten on the big screen. These social justice films are enjoyable, but I would not say that they are entirely pleasant experiences. We’re not talking about rom-coms here.

5. Historical accuracy can be offensive. A number of white liberals were outraged at the portrayal of President Lyndon Baines Johnson. From what we know, LBJ was a political pragmatist seeking a “third way” to calm down both sides who were “extremists.”  There’s a difference between being an extremist for love and justice, and being hate-mongering murderous White supremacists, wouldn’t you agree? LBJ and the Brogressive logic of “both sides as equally bad” is actually a form of linguistic violence, where there is a lack of nuance as well as no understanding of differences between the two parties.  Artful truth does damage to the psyche of many within the dominant culture, which would rather believe and live in the fantasy of the happy Negro rather than the real struggles of human being nonviolently revolting for political freedom. 

 

side noteTim Roth’s performance as Governor George Wallace was an Abomination. Props if you get that reference.**

So what do you think? Did I leave out anything about Selma? Are you more likely to go see it?

(Photo Description: Taken March 1965 Alabama civil rights movement: Selma to Montgomery march: Iakovos, Archbishop of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of North and South America with Martin Luther King, Jr. and Ralph Abernathy (Monday, March 15, 1965)Preferred Citation: Jack Rabin collection on Alabama civil rights and southern activists, 1941-2004 (bulk 1956-1974) , Historical Collections and Labor Archives, Eberly Family Special Collections Library, University Libraries, Pennsylvania State University. Repository: Penn State Special Collections, University Park, PA, Flickr/Creative Commons)

 

12 Years A Slave

Video Linked Here

Watch the awkward video above. It’s so funny, especially when you think of hit NBC comedies like FRIENDS, which went without a major POC character even though it was set in the middle of New York City. Crazy to think what type of mentality leads to these “oversights.” After going to see 12 Years A Slave, I believe Steve McQueen is a hit-maker in his own right, and hopefully a certain company I like (WB, cough cough) will scoop him up for television show or plenty, and a few films. Below, I offer my own reflections from my experience of 12 Years A Slave.

TRIGGER WARNINGS FOR RAPE CULTURE, GRATUITOUS VIOLENCE, AND WHITE SUPREMACY, AND LASTLY, SPOILER ALERT!

I was in a rush to get to the movie theater. It’s right across the street from my weekend retail job, and I had 20 minutes to get from there to the movie tavern. As I rose up the escalator, I felt the 3:55pm showtime pass, I was nervous. Not that I wouldn’t get the seat, but that there wouldn’t be any trailers and they would go right to the movie. Um wrong. I chose my seat, I was the last person to purchase a ticket, it was middle-middle, all though closer to the front, but always, middle-middle. Perfect. The movie trailers featured casts with black actors and even a black church movie promoting the politics of respectability UGH! I was surrounded by a diverse audience but it was predominantly white. A black family had brought their toddler into the movie (um what?, yeah). I planned to only order a Sprite, because seriously, who is going to be able to watch a movie like this and eat. Not my neighbors. They ordered a ton of food, and let’s just say their plates were basically full and got cold at the movie’s conclusion. A few people left after the first 15 minutes of the movie. Predictable.

First, I would like to start with the discussion of the character Patsey, played by Lupita Nyong’o Nyong’o ‘s performance was awe-inspiring. When we talk about the enslavement of African persons on U.S. shores, historians and average persons both like to forget that this system was built on profaning the family and rape culture. In this film, Patsey is the best cotton-pickin’ slave (literally) that Master Epps (who I will get to later) owns. She is precious in his sight both as a cash cow and a sex object. While this movie is about the pain of black men similarly to Mel Gibson’s “Passion Of The Christ” addresses the pain of white men, in order to fully understand McQueen’s message, we must remember the narrative of Patsey. The anguish of Patsey leads her to becoming suicidal. She is the Sally Hemmings of Epps’ plantation. Master Epps considers himself blessed by God’s grace even when he sends away all of his slaves (due to his cotton crop being diminished by the boll weevil) and starts being “steady” with Patsey (what he calls ‘righteous living’). Patsey is rendered physically disabled as the movie moves on, her scars in her eyeballs and the marks on her back are poignant history lessons for audience members who had bought into whitewashed versions of history. Patsey a monstrosity because of her gender, race, disability, and social position. Steve McQueen’s writing (and Lupita Nyong’o ‘s acting talent) confront the oppressive gazes of his audience with intersectionality in a way that we have no choice but to weep.

Master Epps played by Michael Fassbender, what can I say? he was terrifying as he was pious. MAGNETO’S execution of this role is exactly what acting is all about. I don’t have to go to see another horror movie this film season because Master Epps just frightened me. The way he so easily read the Bible and then added his own “text” so as to make the enslaved Africans believe that a master giving them 140 lashes for not meeting the 200 pounds of cotton a day picked limit was “Scripture.” The scene where we are introduced to Epps exposes the dirty little secret of Biblical Studies, that recognizing the interpreter as subject is crucial to the task of reading the Bible in community.

The scene with the slave auction, which felt more like a very formal dinner party than any auction, but the thing that stood out to me beside the use of the “N-Word” was the separation of a little black boy and his mother. Another interested enslaver asked the boy to show how high he could jump, and after the boy proved them how much potential he had, the white men called this kid “a beast.” White supremacist logic makes the elites the foreordained predestinators of where black bodies ought to go. The stereotype that all black people are athletes, or that we all know how to play the bass (South Park reference) means that we are just here for everyone’s entertainment. Blacks are only acceptable when they fit the roles that white supremacist society has chosen for them. This is the essential problem with our protagonist, Solomon Northup, he is literate, but as a slave, he please his masters by keeping his mouth shut, and playing the fiddle. The beginning of Solomon’s enslavement is his belief that his role for the circus is to do concerts. Yes, he is musically successful, but the only way that white supremacist society will let him share the stage with white folks is if he can entertain them. What makes both hip hop AND professional sports as part of contemporary plantation system is that they have convinced black boys and girls, that their choices are limited, it’s either sports, music, prison, or poverty. This is why fighting for public education is a good thing, because we can open up so many other worlds of possibilities for all of our youth.

AND NOW FOR MY CRITICISM OF THIS MOVIE.

#1. This movie is way way way way too graphic that it could be triggering for a lot of persons who are victims of rape and physical abuse.

#2. I am sick of “The Critically Acclaimed Black Film” from Glory to The Help to Remember The Titans to Coach Carter to Lean On Me to The Butler, why does every “black film” have to have negative tropes to define black people in prescribed racial roles. From where I am standing, “black films” are only acceptable if they show black people as being either subservient, or angry or criminal. Like Steve McQueen asks in the video, where are the RomComs with blacks and Latinos from New York? My props for McQueen for giving us a history lesson in this movie, but look, he shouldn’t have to. If it weren’t for whitewashed histories being taught in social studies classes, McQueen and other POC directors wouldn’t have to do movies like these.

#3. This movie has white Saviordom written all over it. First, we had Benedictine CucumberSandwich play a moderate, “good” Southern gentleman so that we could all have the sympathy that good white enslavers had in saving the lives of their property. Awww how sweet! BTW, I really didn’t see the difference between the logic that JJ Abrams had in justifying whitewashing Khan and Master Ford’s approach to Northup as an “exceptional negro.” The concept of “the exceptional negro” while it might sound like white supremacist society is open and inclusive, it really reveals its exclusion, the colored bodies that WS disciplines out of its presence. And really, did Brad Pitt have to play the abolitionist who saves the day? Really? Really? We couldn’t have some obscure actor to do the job? Ugh. Just. Ugh. STAHP. IT!

Fruitvale Station #FruitvaleStation #TrayvonMartin

I HAVE THE SPOILERS HIDDEN, I HAVE THE SPOILERS HIDDEN, DO NOT CLICK ON THE SPOILERS IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO KNOW THEM

The Fruitvale BART station platform.

The Fruitvale BART station platform. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Tonight, I was invited by a friend to go see the movie Fruitvale Station.  My favorite blogs on tumblr have been writing good reviews, actually just recommendations to go see the film. I had no idea what it was going to be about.  If you have not gone to see this movie, I highly recommend that you do.  It was obvious from the previews before the movie started, that the intended audience was one that desired to be more socially conscious, and favored drama.  Fruitvale Station was based on the true story of Oscar Grant.  It passes both Bechdel tests rather quite easily as well: The Race/POC bechdel and the Gender/Bechdel tests. That’s the end of the spoiler-free review. Go see the movie. NOW!!!

*SPOILERS BELOW!!!! SPOILERS BELOW!!!!*

Continue reading