Tag Archives: capitalism

The Pro-Life Progressive: An Endangered Species?

It’s been quite a long while since I have had a political rant. It’s also been a while since I’ve written on the Consistent Ethic of Life I ride or die by. Well that ends today. Usually when bloggers go on political rants, they get on their hobby horse, and preach this holier than thou “partisanship is such so evil, let’s unite everyone and all be centrists” message that it gets pretty stale like last month’s WonderBread.

Ever since I was in high school, I identified as a pro-life Democrat, and it wasn’t until undergrad that I learned of the group of Dems known as the Democrats for Life of America. I have noticed a recent trend recently probably starting back to last year. Pro-life progressives and moderates are being unfairly criticized for not being “pro-life enough” by conservative evangelicals simply because they support or have worked with pro-choice politicians.  This backlash is spurred by primarily conservative writers.  On the liberal side of things, pro-life progressives still remain marginalized as well.  During the Democratic Nation convention, as a few times in the past, pro-life Democrats were treated as second-class citizens once again.  At Daily Theology, Kevin Ahern pointed to the rise in the number of Op-Eds making Joseph Cardinal Bernardin the scapegoat from everything to “Obamacare” to a cryptic boogey man of  “Chicago-style” Catholic politics.

As Ahern notes,

“Joseph Bernardin’s moral vision, best articulated with the phrase “consistent ethic of life,” should make us uncomfortable. Rooted squarely in the Gospel message of Jesus Christ and the Christian tradition, this vision challenges all of us to humbly reflect on how our politics, lifestyle choices, and ideologies promote or harm human dignity, with particular attention to the least among us.”

Reading Joseph Cardinal Bernardin opened my eyes to a new way of doing of viewing politics. You see, my problem with conservative and moderate Democrats (blue dog Democrats) is that they voted and behaved too much like Republicans-lites. In our two party system, the moderates are always the ones who lay claim to the moral high ground it assumed because of Big Mean Partisans! The problem with pro-life progressives isn’t that we are not “pro-life enough”; it’s that we run and hide from our particularity, we’re afraid of partisanship, when we shouldn’t be.

Let me put this another way. Because we as pro-life progressives have been marginalized by both sides of the political equations so much, we have chosen to just keep our mouths shut. With our silence, we are suppressing our own distinct voice. When we have newspapers mourning the demise of Blue Dog / Southern Democrats, this should not be seen as sad news. This should be looked at as an opportunity for pro-life liberals and moderates to make their voices heard, and not only that, to make it more distinct. Political difference isn’t something to be avoided, it is to be embraced first, and then once we have honest conversation, we can move forward towards solidarity and community.

As I have written about in the past, Protestants too have also written on the consistent ethic of life; Dietrich Bonhoeffer being just one of them. In fact, going back to the early Church, and writings like the Didache: from the second chapter: “you shall not murder a child by abortion nor kill that which is born” is found in the same chapter with also “You shall not take evil counsel against your neighbor. You shall not hate any man; but some you shall reprove, and concerning some you shall pray, and some you shall love more than your own life.” Being pro-life is seen along the same lines as not harboring any bigotry; in other words, being anti-racist is being pro-life.

The Way of Life described by the Didache is the politics of the Jesus Way, while the Way of Death includes “First of all it is evil and accursed: murders, adultery, lust, fornication, thefts, idolatries, magic arts, witchcrafts, rape, false witness, hypocrisy, double-heartedness, deceit, haughtiness, depravity, self-will, greediness, [etc.]” The Early Christian authors of the Didache recognized that Rape Culture is part of the Culture of Death.

The Didache, Bonhoeffer, Joseph Cardinal Bernardin, and Pope John Paul II are just a few examples I could give from the past. In modern times, one example could be pastors like Eugene Cho (who btw, is located in the Pacific Northwest, not South) who writes about the “womb to tomb” Consistent Ethic of Life and who also lives it out with projects such as the One Days’ Wages Campaign.

To identify as a pro-life progressive, is to give voice to the voiceless. It is about taking radical actions such as not only protecting the lives of fetuses, but to also protect children from rape culture and abuse by listening to their stories. A commitment to the Consistent Ethic of Life is consistent with movements towards integral human liberation, “in choosing sides with the little ones on the margins, the Crucified Lord joins the struggle of crucified peoples of history: whether that be the enslaved Africans on American shores, a fetus conceived within the womb of a single mother or a person sentenced on death row.  The power of the Cross destroys all false idols, and its that power, the omnipotence displayed of God suffering with us that should keep Christians from making the fetus a “fetish.”

What I am not trying to say is that pro-life progressives have to vote Democrat. I would love for more Republicans to take a stand against the death penalty or support raising the minimum wage to a living wage, for example. We must come to see that politics is more than who we vote for in the voting booth. If there is to be a triumph of the Culture of Life over the Culture of Death (with its White Supremacy, infanticide, rape culture, and economic inequality), politics must be viewed as having to do with all of life. Pro-life progressives/Democrats should stop behaving/voting like Republicans in order to gain acceptance, and we who hold on to the Consistent Ethic of Life should stop acting like we are “above” partisan politics and activism. It’s well past time for Pro-Life Progressives to make a clear case for their causes across POLITICAL party LINES and REGIONAL differences..*

If you enjoyed this post, you may also like:

Pro-Life and Black

Pro-Life and Black, Part 2: Bonhoeffer, Slavery, Abortion, and Black Bodies

Black and Pro-Life 3: Resisting the Death Penalty in Mississippi

*I hope to address cultural/racial and religious differences, & ecumenism when it comes the Consistent Ethic of Life in the near future

Thank You, Bill Gates!

Bill Gates at the World Economic Forum ,2007.

Bill Gates at the World Economic Forum ,2007. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

“Our priorities are tilted by marketplace imperatives. The malaria vaccine in humanist terms is the biggest need. But it gets virtually no funding. But if you are working on male baldness or other things you get an order of magnitude more research funding because of the voice in the marketplace than something like malaria.”

Thanks, Bill Gates, “pure” “free” market Capitalism means male baldness gets more research dollars over more pressing needs. Now, would you be so kind of an altruist and give me a free copy of Windows 8?!?!?

Wired UK: Bill Gates: capitalism means male baldness research gets more funding than malaria

Enhanced by Zemanta

Lance Armstrong And The Religious Myth Of White Male Rugged Individualism

Lance Armstrong Foundation

Lance Armstrong Foundation (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This post is not for the sheeple out there who remained vigilant in their defense of cheating athlete Lance Armstrong. I am not writing a “I Told Ya So” post because that would be just beneath me and would be a form of gloating. Tonight, I feel like discussing performance enhancing drugs in professional sports and masculinity. When one wants to talk about what it means to be a man in the United States today, it means pursuing a stable career, living a virile and healthy lifestyle, and accomplishing all of your goals through your “own” grit and determination. In the early 2000s, when LiveStrong came on the scene, Lance Armstrong lead a religious revival in the hope of white masculine identity. You see, Lance Armstrong was a cancer survivor. He won the Tour De France SEVEN times in a row, between the years 1999 and 2005. It was almost like a fairytale. On an eerily similar note, Major League Baseball, between the years 1998 and 2003, had witnessed some of the highest scoring seasons (team-wise) as well as record-breaking performances by individuals like Barry Bonds, Mark McGuire, and Sammy Sosa. Single-season home run records were being shattered, votes of the Most Valuable Player and playoff positions were decided with one swing of the bat. These were fairytale stories, not in the positive sense, I am using the term negatively.

I call it a fairytale, but more accurately, believing in the Lance Armstrongs and Mark McGuires of the world is participating in the religion of White Male Rugged Individualism. Rugged Individualism is social Darwinism, Par Execellance,, the survival of the fittest of those able to afford boots to strap up for themselves. We see Horatio Alger stories everywhere, and today specifically in sports. We tell that little black kid that his only hope is in becoming owned by a white professional team owner. Of course, this religion is based off a HUGE lie. Sammy Sosa and Lance Armstrong, they did not make it to the top by themselves. They had help tying their steroid-pumping shoe laces. At the very foundation of this false religion, the cornerstone is PRIDE. An arrogance derived from privilege and institutional power control throughout history.

When accusations of Armstrong and Bonds cheating first reached our ears, their apologists came out of the wood work, and even our anti-French/American Exceptionalist bias kept us from ignoring criticism overseas. The end result is that now the US American public looks foolish for having an idol(s) who lied and cheated to get ahead.  And that’s the dirty little secret to our beloved Rugged Individual: it’s a FALSE sense of self-reliance + A Real Denial of Your Neighbor.

And that’s why Herbert Hoover could give this speech about American prosperity while remaining silent on the issue of racial segregation. The climb to the top on the backs of others.

Enhanced by Zemanta