James on The Tory Preacher John MacArthur

(en) Libya Location (he) מיקום לוב

Image via Wikipedia

I mentioned earlier that a group of bloggers have pointed out John MacArthur’s stance against the Libyan, Egyptian, and Tunisian rebellions as sinful. But as I have argued on Brian’s post, I think placing one’s rules (subjective and quite suspicious interpretation of Romans 13, for example) over that of the sanctity of life is the very defition of legalism that Jesus protested in such gospel passages as Mark 7.

James Bradford Pate shared on facebook, and now I would like to share it too, his post from 2008 when MacArthur said that the Revolutionary War was a bad thing. See here: John MacArthur on Voting, American Revolution.

He is well within his right to interpret Scripture in such a way, and in American history class, we know that the majority of American colonists were against the Revolution. There were reverends who preached that the colonists should submit to Tory rule. So, again, no argument that the history is not there. But is it necessary to call revolution and voting a sin?  I question such definition of sinfulness. If participation in democratic republic is such a sin, then participating in that nation’s economy is sinful as well, and by that I mean, having even the coinage which that government provides, let alone joining in the consumption of goods by selling and marketing  a study bible name after yourself.  As many political theorists keep pointing out, neo-liberal economics and democracy/representative government go hand and hand. You cannot just accept one without embracing the other, and that is what we are seeing in the Middle East (of Europe and the West) right now. So before Tory preachers say they are sinless by avoiding partaking in this democracy, let them re-consider  by first glancing at their wallets.  😉

Enhanced by Zemanta

0 thoughts on “James on The Tory Preacher John MacArthur

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention James on The Tory Preacher John MacArthur | Political Jesus -- Topsy.com

  2. Brian LePort

    @Rod: It is interesting that MacArthur touts the US as an exemplary nation when our uprising against Great Britain was a very violent one and the one in Egypt was mostly a peaceful, almost Gandhi-like protest-style revolution.

    I know you have pushed strongly for non-violence and I tend to fall that way as well. Does that lead you to see the American revolution as having been wrong in its method?

    Reply
    1. Rod of Alexandria Post author

      Well, it really depends on whether one sees the American revolution as a matter of self-defense.

      I do not think that war is ever necessary and that it only comes as a response to cycles of violence; that being said, the Revolution was not the only way that the colonists could free themselves, so yes the Revolution was right in principle but wrong on method.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *